The Different Types of Domainers

Posted in Domains, Internet, Media, Webmasters | (14) Comments

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

There are quite a few approaches to domains and domaining that domainers take. Its like the stock market or real estate market to a certain extent, everyone has their own strategy and most of them pay well for their proponents. I’ve pretty much seen most of the types and will try and enumerate them to enable you to follow what you’d rather be doing.

The Investor
These are the sharpest of them all. Buy good quality when prices are low, hold long term, sell high. These guys hold onto assets, maybe even develop them, ensure that they’re hot and in demand when the market is totally ripe, then sell them. The advantages of emulating this type is that you can afford to sell 1% of your portfolio each year and still manage to pull in the major bucks. The downside is renewals, unless your portfolio generates enough revenue, this cost needs to be factored in. People like Frank Schilling, Rick Schwartz, Sahar Sarid, Adam Dicker, Michael Goldman and probably most of the other big ticket guys will be found in this group.

The Flipper
These guys live to make a fast buck and sometimes the ‘buck’ can be a hundred thousand dollars or more on great buys. They know exactly which domain they can sell and to whom and for how much. If they can buy domains that they can sell immediately (1hr to 3 months) for higher valuation, they’re very liable to take the deal. This kind can be equated to the floor traders of yore. They’re fast, nimble and never hold large portfolios, in fact some only have the one domain they want to sell, right now, before moving on the next big deal. There is a lot of money to be made this way too, however its short term, here and now. So if you don’t sell, you don’t churn. I’ve seen some huge success stories in this lot too, Derek Giordano and Reece Berg are top of the mind here.

The Developer
Theres one more breed of domainer who makes money by doing something with their properties, hand regs, niche domains and the type. They take the domain, develop it, add content, do seo, market it and voila, eventually these low value domains become decent value properties. So $20 on a domain + $500 developing could easily lead to a sale, a few months down the line, in the $5000 range. Guys who do this have substantial skills in development, seo and promotion, without which this is just not possible. You could outsource development but then that could also kill your profit margins here. Guys who do this with some success include Adrian Allen and Lord Brar.

The Builder
A lot of people build websites on domains for their own selves. They are not looking to sell the sites or even would even with good offers, simply because the sites normally create more opportunities than can be equated into the bottomline as credit. These type of domainers are actually a major credit and can be found among all the types listed above. Top names that come to mind include Justin Allen and Tan Tran.

The Monetizer
These guys are only interested in the traffic revenues. They’re happiest buying domains that get traffic and make money via parking or similar. In fact some of the biggest deals in the past have included portfolios of well known monetizers. Now of course this particular breed has been overrun by big time players with hundreds of millions of dollars invested and go under the guise of ‘media companies’. This is probably the holy grail of domaining, whats better than pointing a domain to an automatic page and let clicks get you revenues? Kevin Ham, Yun Ye, NameMedia, DemandMedia and others fit into this group, as they do elsewhere but a vast majority of their revenues probably come from this.

The Broker
Usually unsung, rarely known and generally dealing on the QT are the domain brokers. These guys have a huge network of contacts and know whats moving, how and when. I don’t really have much experience with these type of people but Rick Latona is instant recall. :)

The Provider
A lot of domainers have some skill which is monetize-able and fairly useful for the non-developers. This can be writing, design, hosting or a wide variety of web development and promotion activities. I know this is not exactly domaining but I know enough people who do this to make money for domains. Popular people include Peter Mark and Leland Fiegel.

There are a few more kinds but I’d rather not go there right now, but if you’re interested in knowing drop me a comment and i may put them up in a different post.

This of course is by no means a complete list of the type of domainers out there. I hope that people whose names have been mentioned do not take umbrage at being categorized, I’m just trying to get a recall factor in by name dropping.

I’m sure all of them would have certain activities in other categories. I can see myself in about 3 too.

iPhone - A Quantum Leap in Human Technology

Posted in News, Philosophy, Technology | No Comments

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Steve Jobs of Apple, Inc announced the launch of the iPhone. Everyone agrees that the phone looks great, has sufficient nextgen features to make it ‘desirable’ and are ready to buy it, as soon as it is available for everyone.

iPhone

Jeff Ventura at Graceful Flavor has written a fabulous, analytical post on the iPhone that says

“From what we can tell now, the iPhone literally looks like Apple went to 2012 and returned with one of their mobile phones. It does everything I would ever want it to, and with such a seemingly graceful interface, that I would very literally consider switching from Verizon to Cingular just to get this device. It has potential to be that good.”

This is so true. Think about it (salivating is optional) a cellphone, with business apps (email, docs, more!), that can connect to to the web (voice chat via - skype, msn, yahoo, more!?), a personal digital camera (2MP, prints at 4″x6″, enough for the most of us ‘family photographers’), that has a mind blowing user interface and looks something straight out of a sci-fi spy movie!

The only downside for those of us in India is that we will probably get to use this only in 2008 (as per the available information). Don’t know if I’d switch service providers for the phone, but then again, we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it. (

Actually, why are phone numbers not transferable between service providers in India… but I digress).
He goes on to say

“It has potential to be a truly disruptive technology, and everyone knows it. The iPhone has rocked the mobile phone market with an example of convergence that has never before been done so well, so elegantly. Look how long it took PDAs and phones to converge to the point they are now.”

It does not just have the potential, I think it qualifies completely as a disruptive technology. This goes beyond convergence, its a quantum leap in Human Technology. What Apple has done with the iPhone is to jump from the simple convergence path to a whole new plane - one where current technological devices meet the realm of sci-fi - in realtime!

I think that not only will this phone be the standard to live upto for generations of phones ahead - it will pretty much catapult the company from being a computer plus music player seller to being a personal electronics major in the years to come.

iPhone Tech Specs

RSS