Has .TV finally broken through the glass ceiling?


Samit Madan is an advertising professional with over 25 years of experience. He's also known as the MediaWizard due to his expertise in all related industry verticals including design, promotions, brand development, corporate communications, printing, web development and search marketing. He currently heads MediaWiz, a leading Media Publishing and Services Company.

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. RH says:

    Nice article Samit, When we get past the nonsense that takes place on forums about .tv is not .com, (no one ever said it was .com) I think everyone sees the sales have picked up both in quantity and price.

    Eyecare.tv selling for $10,000 is something that would not have been seen in 2007 or even 2009.

    Today Set.tv sold for $29,000 and a lot of LLL.tv are registered each week off the premium list. Demand for short .tv domains both two and three letter seem to be picking up.

    Keeping a small, quality portfolio in .tv with an emphasis on not getting caught up in hype, and focusing on names that make sense with the extension should produce decent returns for most .tv investors. You have to be more picky and precise with .tv.

    Again IMO

    Thank you for the article.

    • mediawizard says:

      Thanks Ray! And also thanks for sharing the info about set.tv and short .tv domains, makes sense when you think of it.

      Short dictionary word domains are increasingly rare and more desirable, logical that these type of names will do just as well in .tv as well.

      My .tv portfolio is completely in keeping with your thinking, quality over quantity by far.

  2. Windy City says:

    I dunno, but I think that the economy attempting to flex its muscle, the .com domain names pricing themselves out of the market like it’s the 20th century and there is no other alternative and the younger generations increasing familiarity with extensions other than the “king of extensions” is becoming conducive to buyers, endusers more than likely, building confidence that they can reap a profit from this extension.

    If you do not have the budget for a domain name in the .com arena and it is available and within your budget in .tv, you got yerself a brand! Talk about cost-effective! And yes, I do believe that the economy is indeed helping this take place. As it gets healthier, so will the .tv extension.

    • mediawizard says:

      Actually any domain can be priced out of the market and you’re right in saying that a lot of .com pricing is way beyond the reach of the average developer.

  3. Marco says:

    It’s about branding. Can’t get .com, can’t get your country code? Where do you go for something people will see as a brand and actually remember? .TV is one of your better choices, because people have seen many .tv sites advertised. .ME if it gets used and live sites get advertised may soon be as good a choice, but lacks the suggestion of having video content or being a channel that you get with .tv.

    • mediawizard says:

      Yeah, I also own .ws domains, what some people don’t seem to realise is that newgtlds will be 3 characters or more, so shorter extensions will have some brand advantage in a world where attention spans are increasing shorter, just as brands need to be.

  4. jeux voiture says:

    Its such as you learn my thoughts! You appear to grasp a lot approximately this, such as you wrote the ebook in it or something. I feel that you could do with some p.c. to drive the message home a little bit, however instead of that, that is fantastic blog. An excellent read. I’ll certainly be back.

  1. May 25, 2012

    […] by dint of the amount of investment in developing websites on that extension. Here is my post: Has .TV finally broken through the glass ceiling? __________________ Premium Domains for Sale | Domain Broker | Domain Consultant | Domain Blog […]